Can A Structured Settlement Allow For A Cash Payout?

This question applies to those times when an arrangement has provided a financial or funding company with the chance to buy some plaintiff’s structured settlement. The company that has made that purchase then gives a lump sum to the plaintiff. In other words, the plaintiff gets a cash payout.

The exact size of that cash payout (lump sum) depends on the percent of the structured settlement that has been sold to a financial or funding company. A listing of the plaintiff’s rights would include the right to sell all of part of a structured settlement.

Benefits enjoyed by those plaintiffs that take a cash payout:

They enjoy immediate access to what a judge and jury in a court have awarded the winner of a personal injury lawsuit. In some cases, that could mean immediate access to a large sum of money. Sometimes plaintiffs harbor uncertainties, regarding their ability to handle such a large amount of money; then later they change their minds.

Release from an inflexible schedule, one that governs the time for the arrival of each payment. Such a schedule can dictate the time of the month when the winner of a personal injury lawsuit feels able to think seriously about buying a desired item.

Ability to avoid those losses that might be caused by periodic payments. Each loss would represent a lowering of the size of the plaintiff’s initial award. That initial award was meant to serve as compensation for damages, which the awarded victim had suffered at the time of an accident. The main reason they enjoy the benefit of a higher compensation is the Personal Injury Lawyer in Stouffville.

Downsides to obtaining a cash payout:

Each judicial district within Canada has its own set of rules. Structured settlements are not allowed in certain judicial districts. In the absence of such settlements, a plaintiff cannot seek a cash payout. There exists the danger that a plaintiff might choose to work with a bogus funding company. Then the scammed plaintiff would lose more than his or her monetary award. The bogus business would be able to steal valuable information from all the scammed plaintiffs.

Some plaintiffs exhibit a tendency to overspend, after receiving some paid-out cash. A structured settlement is supposed to put an end to that bad habit, but some people are such devoted shoppers that they work to detour the obstacle that the government has allowed to be raised.

A plaintiff’s possession of cash that has been paid out grants each such sum’s possessor with an added measure of control, control over their monetary award. Having managed to achieve that level of control, the same group of people must surrender their chance to enjoy freedom from taxation.